Monday, August 29, 2011

Camera In Action- Response to PRISM


PRISM by CorridorDigital
The short Youtube film known as "PRISM" is a compelling film with stunning effects and great screenplay to accompany an interesting plot. The film is set sometime in the future, with advanced technology present in the public world.

Lets start off with a few things seen across the entire video. This was filmed with many of the shots using a handheld camera, without a tripod or other stabilizing device. This may have made it seem less cinematic, but in return, caused the action scenes to become more intense and captivating. There were also many scenes that used close ups, which could add to a more emotional feel.


After the intro, the first few scenes gives us an establishing of the setting. We can infer that it the film is taking place in some sort of futuristic rendition of New York City, or any other large, populated city. In these scenes, the background is more dominant, attracting our eyes towards them, but we still acknowledge the existence of the characters by the clever rack focus at 0:28.


Here we can see the connection between the two characters through their conversation and use of the shot/reverse shot. The shot/reverse shot is used to show a conversation without using a two shot, where both actors are seen in the shot.

The lighting in this shot purposely casts shadows across the man's face in order to establish that this man is the main antagonist and will play a major role in ruining the actors' fun, and causing a load of trouble.


In the first screenshot, the scene has high key lighting in order to highlight that they have just escaped trouble. A celebration would be appropriate, until the next scene, where they realize that they haven't escaped just yet. In the second screenshot, the lighting is suddenly low-key in order to show that trouble is nearby and thus, creates suspense.


This is an excellent movement match where the character walks up the wall, and we are cut to the point where he lands and takes down the soldier. This is all done without breaking the 180 degree line, which helps keep continuity and allows the viewer to follow the action.

This film is obviously of the action/sci-fi genre, but this style isn't what you'd see in any old Star Wars movie. This film style gives it a more humane, and less robotic style by using the handheld camera. With a tripod, this movie would look still, and lifeless. The simple fact that the human hand isn't perfectly still, adds that small touch that gives this film more life than other films.

4 comments:

  1. the analysis of the film was very informative and descriptive they demonstrated a proper knowledge of the techniques behind the filming and of film vocabulary. The author didn't focus on the plot, which i accidentally did, but instead focused mainly on the key points and important information that pertained to the film itself. How each compositional shot was relevant and even went as far as to thoroughly describing why it was so important. Everything was fluent, the screenshots were well placed, and i felt the only criticism I have, if at all any, was to show how the story ended. I was a bit curious to see their opinions on it, but other than that a well though out review!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonderful film. This analysis was very thorough, and was full of proper vocabulary to correctly describe the different camera angles, lighting, and cutting that Corridor Digital achieved. Yet I would like to criticize the criticism only on these movement matches and angles. You hardly criticized the dominant color tone, the composition of the scenes or the audio work on this film. Besides that, everything was just spiffy.
    --CKW

    ReplyDelete
  3. This film was an action packed thriller that used nerf guns very well in place of real guns. Your analysis on the film was almost as good as the film itself. You were able to use the film vocabulary outstandingly. You noticed the shots were used without a tripod in which you emphasized how it influenced the action scenes. You didn't focus on the plot as much and you focused more on the scenes itself. Your fim analysis Gino is perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This film was action packed, and I agree that the match action cuts were very fluid. You used very sophisticated language when analyzing the film, and went into very good detail. I like how you explained the importance of the lighting and how it impacted the plot of the film.

    ReplyDelete